Striking reaction in the controversy of Luisgé Martín’s book about the crime of José Breton: the poor opinion of political parties in Congress, last Tuesday. One after another, the spokesmen of the PP, Mr. Tellado; Compromís, Mrs. Mico; Add, … Mr. Pueyo; Vox, Mrs. Millán; In Comú Podem, Mrs. Vidal, and Podemos, Mr. Sánchez (Javier). One would expect from the leaders of the Clear Ideas Groups, a criterion, leadership that helps solve the dilemmas of public life.
As the Minister of Equality, Ana Redondo, who applauded the request that the book be prohibited. Or Semper that declared ABC his support for freedom of expression. But Congress … We should demand more than common places and fear of surveys. Because, of course, that’s the Quid. Representatives are more at a time, of those who seek not to slip or mistake, whose mission is mainly that, to guess what the possible voters want to hear.
In Congress, neither one appealed to an integral defense of freedom of expression nor explained that it is compatible with the right of Ruth Ortiz, as a victim, to denounce so that justice settles the conflict between his honor and intimacy and that of the writer to create any narrative. All became entangled in common places about respect and freedom in generic container.
Strange consensus, little courage. And the elongated silence as a shadow of Ciprés shown by the Minister of Culture, Ernest Urtasun, caught in feminist speeches and without known opinion on the free debate of the year. He, who carries the sector and fills him with cultural rights.
Session boundary
- Access to premium content is open by courtesy of the establishment where you are, but right now there are too many users connected at the same time. Please try it after a few minutes.
Try again
You have exceeded the session limit
- You can only have three sessions initiated at the same time. We have closed the oldest session to continue sailing without limits in the rest.
Keep sailing
Article only for subscribers
Report an error
#Jesús #García #Calero #seek