The player’s lawyer Jennifer Hermoso, Ángel Chavarría, has stressed during his final report in the trial against Luis Rubiale S that he deserves to be convicted because he has been accredited that “obviously there was no consent of that sexual assault” when he kissed a kiss To the player in the delivery of medals of the Sydney World Cup: “We are not facing consent, we are facing a submission,” he said. Chavarría inaugurated the session of this Thursday with his conclusions after yesterday the prosecution did the same. Both accusations request a year in prison for Rubiales for sexual aggression and a year and a half for a crime of coercion of which the former selector Jorge Vilda also accuses, whom he was a sports director of the National Team, Albert Luque and then responsible for Marketing of the Federation of the Federation , Rubén Rivera. On the kiss, Chavarría has stressed that it was “an attack on sexual freedom” of beautiful because it has been evidenced during the trial that she saw in a “totally passive” situation, without reaction capacity. He argues that Rubiales neither asked him nor could he have asked for that kiss attending to the protocol against the sexual harassment of the RFEF, but even if he had asked for it, “I was going to consumm it in any case, there was no possibility to escape” for the player . Standard related news not the prosecutor, in the trial: «It will be left as ‘Jenni that of the kiss’ because of Rubiales» Isabel Vega Vilda, Luque and Rivera armored the disabled president while the prosecution is proven by the sexual aggression of sex impact that despite what Rubiales maintains, there is no evidence that there is consent, neither in that alleged expert prepared by a deaf person of birth without a degree that had been carried out for the FIFA sanctioning file and that his defense contributed to the Judgment, where the ‘expert’, Daniel Morillo, had to rely on an interpreter “because he could not read the judge’s lips.” Relay has revealed this Thursday that this interpreter, which was said impartial and hired by a company, is actually the secretary of Morill or. «The existence of consent has to be clear, conclusive and manifested freely. Is it clear here? Is it conclusive? Is it free when he had blocked his head? “He stressed, to influence that” the stolen kiss is a typical and punishable behavior “and the” euphoria “with which he tries to justify Rubiales his behavior,” he is not attenuating nor eximENT »of the crime. He has cited at this point two sentences of the Supreme Court that yesterday also put on the table the prosecutor of the National Court, Marta Durántez. One, the relative to ‘the pack’ of the Sanfermines that condemned for sexual aggression. The other, about the sexual assault of a policeman who tried to kiss a detainee who was in his custody. The conclusion is analogous in both cases: a woman cannot have “a kind of sense of sexual servitude of having to endure a man’s desire.” “The entire federative structure underway to save him” in terms of coercion, Chavarría recalled that at the stroke of testimony, he has been accredited that after the kiss Rubiales put “the entire federative structure underway” to save himself and recalled that the first statement in which words were attributed to the player she had not pronounced, she said: “It was a gesture of affection and thanks.” “Thank you?” The lawyer wondered, “What did the beautiful lady, to kiss him Rubiales?” From there, he has compiled what he acted in the trial to underpin his accusation for coercion against Vilda for the conversation with the brother of Hermos and Rivera and Luque, for the insistence to the player in Ibiza. “It was important that Rivera got how beautiful he spoke with integrity or failing, with Mr. Luque and Ana Ecube’s testimony is enough, because with his statements he left that insistence to the point of having to interfere,” he said. For the defense of beautiful, it cannot be ignored that all this “has significantly marked the victim, has pointed it out, has stigmatized it not only from Spain but internationally,” recovering the statement left yesterday by the prosecutor in the Chamber, which will never be “Jenni that of the World Cup” but “Jenni, that of the kiss.” Rubiales’ RFEF: “Vertical, manipulative and servilist” as well as the conclusions of the AFE lawyer, María José López, who exercises the only popular accusation in this case because Futpro, the union of women’s professional soccer players, He appeared, nor the RFEF. «Our personation brings the cause of the helplessness of beautiful by the Federation, an institution then directed by one of the defendants who did not want to protect it before a vertical, manipulative and servilist structure of the president and his closest team, a fact that we condemn . An institution that has not led an ethical leadership in the face of the aggression suffered and coercion, ”he said. During his presentation he has focused that the testimony of beautiful “is plausible” and has been corroborating throughout the oral trial, to lead to the conclusion that he received a kiss “in an aggressive, surprising and unexpected way” that constituted a “A violation of body integrity and sexual freedom due to the absence of consent.” López, an expert in sports law, has dedicated a good part of his report to remember that “kissing a player is not allowed in the protocol against harassment” of the Federation, nor even ask for it, and then review the milestones that constitute the center of the accusation for coercion. He requests, as the lawyer of Hermoso and the Prosecutor’s Office, a year and a half in jail for this for each of the defendants and another year for Rubiales for sexual aggression.
#Jenni #Hermosos #lawyer #trial #consent #submission
