It would be enough that Morena is the only party that nominated a probable sexual rapist for governor and had a pedophile as a federal deputy to understand that it had more “negative” than “positive” mentions in the media.
This Wednesday, the inquisitor García Vilchis again wanted to teach journalism classes and pontificate on the importance of contexts, but convincingly omitted that her party got on the chest with that pair of sexopaths.
If it is not serious that the Palace is “denounced” to “conventional” media (press, radio and television) for spreading more “negative” than “positive” notes of the party in power against other political groups, what was said in the morning yesterday would be to laugh.
Although “the poor first”, it is assumed that the Presidency of the Republic governs for all Mexicans, without political, ideological, social, religious, racial or economic phobias and phobias, which forces the Executive Power to eat their opinion about the parties But, since legality is not exactly his thing, he uses without modesty the resources of the power of the powers to make propaganda to Morena, even resorting to the dishonorable and depressing resource of victimization.
The vagueness of the classification of “positive” and “negative” notes makes it difficult to know precisely what it is about.
Regarding the hoax that every Wednesday’s gallows “is a space for circular dialogue, democratic debate and free expression,” the presidential hitter, Ana Elizabeth García Vilchis, gave figures of the measurements that the National Electoral Institute, since 1996, agrees with the Faculty of Political and Social Sciences of the UNAM so that its researchers record the journalistic coverage of the parties but never, under the pretext of an impossible “balance”, has it dared to suggest or instruct anyone so that the unequal are treated as if they were equal.
Why did the lady hide that most of the notes she complained about are neutral and that the “negative” or “positive” was given in the presentation made by radio and television hosts or in the opinion of columnists and columnists?
Beyond the reprehensible and most likely illegal of insisting on discrediting and demonizing free media and journalists, why would Morena deserve a “positive” journalistic treatment?
Seen the intimidating reproach in reverse, does the Presidency treat its party in a “balanced” way against the opposition “corrupt”, “neoliberal” “conservatives”, “home-traders” and “gangsters”?
The discrediting of journalists and the media has the purpose of imposing as the only truth the lies that bubble in the morning, which has become as normal as the rain. The problem is to encourage physical aggression by fanatics with initiative who, out of simple ignorance, dare to put more lines on the pathological intolerance that the quadrotheists have towards freedom.