HS analysis The government can’t even decide what should be decided first – support and identity crises stick to negotiations

The peat decision is hampered by the sharp collapse of support for the center and the Greens.

Government began mid-term talks in an exceptionally locked situation on Wednesday morning.

There are messages from various parties that in the long-running preliminary negotiations, hardly any solutions have been found. It has not yet been decided even what will be decided first.

The mid-term talks are, in principle, due to end on Thursday, but it is already thought by the ruling parties that the talks could go on Friday or even the weekend.

There is also the possibility that the government will collapse because no compromises can be reached.

“I hope we will come out as a united team that will take Finland forward,” said the Prime Minister Sanna Marin (sd) said as he went to talks with the Estate House on Wednesday.

Government keep decide on large entities, such as how to halt the level of government indebtedness and how much money the government can spend roughly during the final government term.

All decisions are interdependent.

The framework of the state budget can be broadened if decisions are now made that can credibly be assumed to improve employment and thereby increase tax revenues.

A significant part of the stalemate in the negotiations is due to the fact that there is both a crisis of support and an identity crisis in the center.

One the culmination of the negotiations has been to support peat entrepreneurs. There is still no solution.

The issue is quite small for the whole, but symbolically big for the center and the greens.

A significant part of the stalemate in the negotiations is due to the fact that there is both a crisis of support and an identity crisis in the center.

With regard to peat, there is also a decline in support for the Greens makes compromise a nuisance.

When support is low, even small symbolic gains and losses grow larger in size.

According to the centrists, the government is pursuing too green a policy, when in reality the center has got a lot of things through the government in relation to its support.

To the center peat is an even bigger thing than greens.

For peat entrepreneurs goes really bad, and peat companies are widely located in the traditional support areas of the city center.

“Yes, the center has got a bad back here locally. This will rain down on the base Finns, ”said the peat entrepreneur Marko Nummijärvi To HS on the Kauhajoki Palloneva on Monday.

Read more: On sleepless nights, a peat entrepreneur considers covering the entire neva with solar panels: No one buys burning peat from Marko Nummijärvi anymore

In terms of the identity of the Greens, on the other hand, peat has risen in value to the unpredictable, as it is the only striking environmental policy of this rye.

More environmental issues are to be decided in the autumn.

Dispute condensed into peat taxation, which the government tightened at the beginning of the year. With this, it boosted its own goal of halving the use of peat by 2030.

The price of peat emission rights has risen so fast that the government’s goal of halving the use of peat is likely to be achieved as early as next year.

Nevertheless, it is politically important for the Greens to show that they do not give up on environmental issues.

Krista Mikkonen (left), Minister for the Environment and Climate, who represents the Greens, arrived at the Estates House during the mid-government quarrel on Wednesday and exchanged a few words with the protesters.­

The Greens are also ready to support peat entrepreneurs, but the center also wants to reduce the peat tax, which has already been decided once, in order to alleviate the plight of entrepreneurs.

Center wants the Prime Minister ‘s SDP to demand a decision on peat before deciding otherwise. It would reassure the downtown parliamentary group and could speed up negotiations.

Sdp has not done this. If peat is decided first, the SDP and the Left Alliance will lose the tightening screw as they try to resist the cut in earnings-related unemployment security demanded by the center.

It would be key for the center to get peat off the agenda because it could focus on demanding cuts to unemployment security without worrying about peat.

Central source says that in the downtown parliamentary group, peat is more important to many than economic decisions. With regard to peat, the party can no longer submit to the demands of the Greens, the party is being communicated.

The Center believes that the government in general should be a more traditional red soil government focused on jobs and education, run jointly by the SDP and the center, rather than a red-green government.

According to the centrists, the government is pursuing too green a policy, when in reality the center has got a lot of things through the government in relation to its support. The government cut the so-called pension tube and made a pleasant sote proposal for the city center.

The irony is that, in fact, the government has in many respects implemented a traditional red soil policy. Voters just don’t realize it: the center doesn’t get its message across and demars may not want to market it more specifically.

Read more: The center is barked as an auxiliary party to the government, but the claim is not true

The success of the negotiations now largely depends on Marin.

Experiments target two chairmen, the SDP’s Sanna Marini and the Center Annika Saarikko.

During Saarikko, who was elected chairman last autumn, support for the city center has not started to rise.

In the municipal elections in June, the number of delegates to the center is likely to decrease.

In other governing parties, it is thought that Saarikko has not received a proper negotiating mandate from the parliamentary group, because the group is so divided between supporters and opponents of government work.

Marinin the problem, in turn, is that for too long he has focused on dealing with the coronary crisis and left other things to the assistants.

In previous debates, economic policy-makers in particular have come up with solutions to the problems, but now this has not been the case.

The success of the negotiations now largely depends on Marin.

The strong will and bargaining power of the Prime Minister is needed, because, for example, employment decisions are more difficult every round when the solutions for everyone have already been used.

.
#analysis #government #decide #decided #support #identity #crises #stick #negotiations

Next Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

Open chat
Want Guest Post?