Fedez replies on the Codacons case: “I have nothing? Totally decontextualized” – Curler

Fedez responds to the headlines that press him on the declaration of “nothing” in 2020. There would be evidence that they find it decontextualized.

The comparison between Fedez and the Codacons continues thanks to the rapper's response following the rumors spread about his statements to the judges in 2020. Fedez, in fact, attacked those who reported the news of his condition “penniless“. The counter-response from Codacons was not long in coming, replying by defining the story as “rambling”.

The article reporting Fedez's statements during a 2020 hearing arrives in “Repubblica”. On this occasion we are faced with part of the judicial disputes between Fedez and Codacons. The article even included audio of the rapper declaring that he was “worthless.” The reason: his movable and immovable assets were registered in his companies.

This quote was then taken up by various newspapers. Naturally, the titles brought Fedez to respond on social mediaexplaining, at this point, the obvious.

I'm sorry to read this article, I don't understand its meaning and purpose, other than to give readers a distorted idea by reporting my statement in a completely decontextualized way.

Chiara Ferragni's husband, in an intervention published in the same newspaper, clarified that he had answered honestly to a question about the possession of assets, declaring that he is technically “worthless” as everything is registered in the name of his family's companies, as happens with many entrepreneurs . Regarding the checks requested by CodaconsFedez says he is calm:

My companies are available for any inspection by the competent authorities. We have nothing to fear or hide.

Codacons denies the rapper's statement, stating that the legal proceedings against him have not all been archived and that on May 6 he will have to answer for the accusation of slander. Fedez tried to clarify his statements in a 2020 trial, during which he declared himself “worthless”. In fact, it seems that he answered honestly to a question from the judge. He reiterated that his companies are available for any inspection by the competent authorities.