The objections to the reform of the Amparo Law imposed by the ruling party led to Senator Ricardo Monreal to utter a folly slanderous unworthy of his teaching as professor of Constitutional Law at the National Autonomous University of Mexico.
This is how it was reviewed this Saturday by José Luis Martínez in his essential Holy Office for Saturday:
In the noisy ring of Senate, Monreal vehemently defended his proposal. He threw flying kicks, resorted to the reverse crab, the caveman and many other wrestling holds to emerge victorious. With his face reddened, he shouted: “It seems very serious to me, very serious, that the man himself Legislative power is going to submit, is going to be a cover and rug for the dictatorship of the toga…”
With changes to two other laws: that of dispossession of the afores and the very debatable of amnestythe 4th attacks reason in a legislative gang a few weeks before the federal elections, avoiding – due to lack of intelligent argumentation and its characteristic fear of the confrontation of ideas – the “neoliberal” republican debate.
Talking about the “dictatorship of the toga” is colossal nonsense because judges, magistrates and ministers do not govern, only those who hold political power and in no way those dedicated to issuing sentences and at the request of parties to resolve judicial conflicts.
The function of amparo is to guarantee fundamental rights, and the least that López Obradorism should have done was promote broad deliberation among legislators, lawyers, judges, academics and litigants (citizens interested in the transcendental issue).
A characteristic of the reforms prior to those imposed by the government that is just ending was that those involved were listened to, but for five and a half years we have been facing a blatant imposition that will have political and government consequences because it only listens to itself. himself and orders his dictatorship of the legislative majority to pigeonhole everything that comes to mind.
With society divided by the rancor and hatred that emanate from the Palace, the positions that are expressed for or against are also black and white and it is unthinkable to reach a generalized conviction.
For certain things, the right to protection has atrophied to the point, at least in theory, of being able to stop practically any government action.
Although without the slightest modesty the 4t has done what it wanted before the new reform, including the works that are emblematic, with administrative protection it could stop the construction of roads, bridges, aqueducts, railways and other necessary infrastructure works. for national development.
What was approved, however, harms savers aged 70 or older from whom, out of forced “solidarity,” the government will steal their Afores.
However it may be seen, due to intolerance and lack of dialogue and political will, the reform of the protection law is one more notch in the abusive impositions of the ruling party.
@CarlosMarin_soy
More from the same author:
#Dictatorship #39in #toga39
