Pros and cons of the three possible transactions not only in terms of value on the pitch: the possibility of having them on loan, the actual willingness of their clubs to let them go, the price, the salaries and … the reasons are also at stake
The possibilities for Juventus to intervene for the January transfer market in the offensive department are dictated by the economic assessments, but even the technical ones call for the need for an intervention given the difficulties of the Juventus attack. The names of the moment are those of Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang, Anthony Martial and Gianluca Scamacca, each with their respective pros and cons with respect to the feasibility and goodness of the situation.
Because yes
–
In a market that the CEO Arrivabene announced “no drama”, it is difficult to find better opportunities than the Arsenal bomber in a possible exit with the loan formula. The attacker is at odds with the Gunners, after Arteta removed his captain’s armband for disciplinary reasons and put him out of the squad, in the last three games he has not been called up and if nothing changes he will train alone until departure for the African Cup.
Why not
–
Precisely for this reason, because he will leave shortly to play for the African Cup with his Gabon at the beginning of January, which is when Juve’s season is played for today’s goals, that is, when they would be most needed. . With a contract expiring in 2023, it is not easy to take him out on loan if Barcelona needs to replace Aguero for a permanent deal. In any case, an obstacle to the limits of the insurmountable even for a short period is the salary of 15 million.
Because yes
–
Nothing matters more than motivations if you are looking for a player capable of immediately impacting the season and the United striker undoubtedly wants to play, looking for redemption, there is no feeling in Manchester with the new Rangnick course and more generally after the arrival of Cristiano Ronaldo, the space for the French striker was restricted. The consolidated channel opened with the Red Devils for the CR7 affair and not only paves the way for a profitable dialogue.
Why not
–
On the payroll, Martial costs an arm and a leg, with a salary of 15 million a year. A high level even if you find some form of agreement to go down a bit. The arrival on the scene of Sevilla ready to take him to Spain reduces the negotiation margins for a loan operation. And then there are the technical assessments on the role, on whether it is actually a player with the characteristics of Martial what Juventus really needs.
Because yes
–
For the type of pure center forward that Allegri and Juve are looking for, Gianluca Scamacca is less established today than Dusan Vlahovic but he also has more affordable costs, if we talk about acquiring a card and not a loan. And the estimate for the value and growth prospects of the Sassuolo striker are long-standing, if we are now in the third consecutive market session in which the blue is in the black and white viewfinder. It is young and, more than the other names, it can also be a more perspective solution in the formula. The space found now with continuity in Sassuolo feeds his hunger to climb the blue hierarchies.
Why not
–
The fact that last summer, that of the farewell to Cristiano Ronaldo, the profile of Moise Kean was preferred to Scamacca suggests that one excludes the other, and that space has already been committed with the multi-year investment in the former Everton. Even if the salary is much lower than the others and the cost of the price tag much lower than Vlahovic, around 25 million, it is still an expense not budgeted for in January: if the intentions do not change, there will be work on the formula ( from the obligation of redemption upwards), and seeing that selling it immediately is not among Sassuolo’s wishes to find the square has its difficulties.
December 24, 2021 (change December 24, 2021 | 4:00 pm)
© REPRODUCTION RESERVED
.
#Costs #feasibility #technical #joints #Martial #Scamacca #Aubameyang #Juve #casting