Before the intellectuals xochitlistas continue tearing their clothes claiming that the electoral debate was between the democracy opposition and lopezobradorist authoritarianismthe statement of the director of the Salinas group (A) Nexos, Hector Aguilar Caminwill focus the electoral discussion, will post its words in gold letters on the wall of the Legislative Palace and will place 270+ at the center of political-electoral activism intellectuals, activists and former PRI officials.
He Aguilar Camin of Salinism gave the key to understanding the participation of intellectuals in the transport of vote in favor of the candidate Xóchitl Gálvez Ruiz. His words were very forceful:
The intellectuals come in Xochitl “the opportunity to give back to the cultural community the attention, the care, sometimes even the pampering that it had from the Government. Nothing more and nothing less than what Xochitl promises the whole country.”
Ready.
The effort of the deployed in obtaining so many signatures that should be analyzed in political profiles, each one focuses on the three intellectual promoters of the deployed – the renegade ex-communist (in Deutscher mode) and neo-PRI Roger Bartra, the Salinist intellectual and contractor Aguilar Camín and The Berlin Operation activist Enrique Krauze only seeks the pampering of the PRI regime and of course the budgetary resources that in the form of a direct contractor had been given to them by PRI and PAN governments for their publications, their cultural companies and their creative activities.
The display of the 270 intellectuals asking for the vote for — to more than a hundred Mexican intellectuals who were transported in July 1974 on a plane for a tour to South America with President Echeverría and who the essayist Zaid said remembered that model of transporting peasants to vote for the PRI in trucks redilas.
The wording of the xochilist deployment poses an extreme scenario: characterizing the López Obrador model as authoritarian-dictatorial is an intellectual and academic excess because one may be against decisions of the Government of the four 4-T but all of them were submitted to the democratic rules of the majority, which throughout the PRI regime 1929-2018 was exercised by the PRI governments and the two six-year presidential terms of the PAN.
The stridency of the display of redilas pays off, even in much more intense terms than those of the President López Obradorin political and therefore electoral polarization, in addition to using as its own the statement of the pro-Nazi German intellectual Carl Schmitt that portrays political competition in the binary bond of friend-enemy, because the intellectuals’ document defines Xóchitl and followers as friends and adversaries as enemies.
The polarizing and deterministic stridency – that is, in fundamentalist mode of the religious regimes of the Middle East and the old Soviet communist model – has been assumed by the opposition candidate Gálvez Ruiz and her leading intellectuals and is posing to the electoral society the polarization model of good and bad, opponents and pro-government, democrats and dictators.
The mix of intellectuals, former officials, conservative social activists, journalists who already showed affinity with parties in electoral dispute and civil society led by the far-right businessman Claudio X. González and the gutted former PRD member Guadalupe Acosta Naranjo has already drawn the true scenario of the electoral dispute: the political model of the PRI-PAN-PRI-Coparmex-Salinista technocrats of the period 1983-2018 compared to the proposal of social populism with neoliberal macroeconomic stability with proposals for laws that would modify the structure of the regime and the balance between powers that would have to be approved or rejected by the qualified majority of legislators in both chambers and that could never be imposed by force.
Aguilar Camín proposed what could be a campaign slogan, similar to that model of contradiction imposed by the neoliberalism of Miguel de la Madrid and Salinas de Gortari: let the politicians leave and let the technocrats arrive, only now the director of the group (A)Nexes and pivot of the deployment of redilas adjusted it to the real dispute that the men of culture are energizing: “let the populists leave and let the apapachos return.”
More from the same author:
#Camín #cuddles #deployment #redilas
