The Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance ordered an employee to pay to his previous employer 80,000 dirhams, the value of a car purchased by the plaintiff company, and registered in the name of the defendant, for the purpose of using it for the benefit of work, which the latter sold after the end of the working relationship between them for his own account.
In the details, a company filed a lawsuit against a former employee of it, demanding that he pay her an amount of 110,000 dirhams and the legal interest at 12% from the date of filing the lawsuit until full payment with fees and expenses, including attorney fees, noting that it was made during the work of the defendant with it. He bought a car and handed it over to him to use in connection with his work, after which he sold it for his own account.
While the report of the engineering expert specializing in cars delegated by the court showed that the relationship between the two parties to the litigation was a working relationship at the time of the end of this relationship in February 2020, and that the vehicle in question was owned by the defendant, and that it had been subjected to previous traffic accidents, and it has a transmission malfunction estimated at a value Its repair is five thousand dirhams, and the value of the car, which is the subject of the lawsuit, on the date of the completion of the defendant’s work with the plaintiff, is estimated at 80,000 dirhams.
The court stated that it was evident from the lawsuit papers that the plaintiff had paid the value of the car in question to the car dealership, in favor of the defendant by virtue of a bank check, if he worked for it, to use it for the benefit of the business, and registered it in his name, and the defendant did not provide evidence that he had paid the price of the car to the plaintiff or otherwise. that.
The court indicated that the defendant had terminated his services with the plaintiff, who stated that she had bought the car for the purpose of the defendant’s use of it if he worked with it for the benefit of the business, which would have the right to recover its value according to the market value at the time the defendant’s work ended with her, which the expert delegated in the lawsuit estimated at 80,000 dirhams Hence, the defendant is obliged to return the price of the car according to its market value at the time of the termination of the business relationship.
The court ruled to obligate the defendant to pay the plaintiff compensation in the amount of 80,000 dirhams, and interest is 4% from the date the judgment becomes conclusive, and to obligate the defendant to pay fees and expenses, and rejected other requests.
The Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance ordered an employee to pay to his previous employer 80,000 dirhams, the value of a car purchased by the plaintiff company, and registered in the name of the defendant, for the purpose of using it for the benefit of work, which the latter sold after the end of the working relationship between them for his own account.
In the details, a company filed a lawsuit against a former employee of it, demanding that he pay her an amount of 110,000 dirhams and the legal interest at 12% from the date of filing the lawsuit until full payment with fees and expenses, including attorney fees, noting that it was made during the work of the defendant with it. He bought a car and handed it over to him to use in connection with his work, after which he sold it for his own account.
While the report of the engineering expert specializing in cars delegated by the court showed that the relationship between the two parties to the litigation was a working relationship at the time of the end of this relationship in February 2020, and that the vehicle in question was owned by the defendant, and that it had been subjected to previous traffic accidents, and it has a transmission malfunction estimated at a value Its repair is five thousand dirhams, and the value of the car, which is the subject of the lawsuit, on the date of the completion of the defendant’s work with the plaintiff, is estimated at 80,000 dirhams.
The court stated that it was evident from the lawsuit papers that the plaintiff had paid the value of the car in question to the car dealership, in favor of the defendant by virtue of a bank check, if he worked for it, to use it for the benefit of the business, and registered it in his name, and the defendant did not provide evidence that he had paid the price of the car to the plaintiff or otherwise. that.
The court indicated that the defendant had terminated his services with the plaintiff, who stated that she had bought the car for the purpose of the defendant’s use of it if he worked with it for the benefit of the business, which would have the right to recover its value according to the market value at the time the defendant’s work ended with her, which the expert delegated in the lawsuit estimated at 80,000 dirhams Hence, the defendant is obliged to return the price of the car according to its market value at the time of the termination of the business relationship.
The court ruled to obligate the defendant to pay the plaintiff compensation in the amount of 80,000 dirhams, and interest is 4% from the date the judgment becomes conclusive, and to obligate the defendant to pay fees and expenses, and rejected other requests.
The Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance ordered an employee to pay to his previous employer 80,000 dirhams, the value of a car purchased by the plaintiff company, and registered in the name of the defendant, for the purpose of using it for the benefit of work, which the latter sold after the end of the working relationship between them for his own account.
In the details, a company filed a lawsuit against a former employee of it, demanding that he pay her an amount of 110,000 dirhams and the legal interest at 12% from the date of filing the lawsuit until full payment with fees and expenses, including attorney fees, noting that it was made during the work of the defendant with it. He bought a car and handed it over to him to use in connection with his work, after which he sold it for his own account.
While the report of the engineering expert specializing in cars delegated by the court showed that the relationship between the two parties to the litigation was a working relationship at the time of the end of this relationship in February 2020, and that the vehicle in question was owned by the defendant, and that it had been subjected to previous traffic accidents, and it has a transmission malfunction estimated at a value Its repair is five thousand dirhams, and the value of the car, which is the subject of the lawsuit, on the date of the completion of the defendant’s work with the plaintiff, is estimated at 80,000 dirhams.
The court stated that it was evident from the lawsuit papers that the plaintiff had paid the value of the car in question to the car dealership, in favor of the defendant by virtue of a bank check, if he worked for it, to use it for the benefit of the business, and registered it in his name, and the defendant did not provide evidence that he had paid the price of the car to the plaintiff or otherwise. that.
The court indicated that the defendant had terminated his services with the plaintiff, who stated that she had bought the car for the purpose of the defendant’s use of it if he worked with it for the benefit of the business, which would have the right to recover its value according to the market value at the time the defendant’s work ended with her, which the expert delegated in the lawsuit estimated at 80,000 dirhams Hence, the defendant is obliged to return the price of the car according to its market value at the time of the termination of the business relationship.
The court ruled to obligate the defendant to pay the plaintiff compensation in the amount of 80,000 dirhams, and interest is 4% from the date the judgment becomes conclusive, and to obligate the defendant to pay fees and expenses, and rejected other requests.
The Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance ordered an employee to pay to his previous employer 80,000 dirhams, the value of a car purchased by the plaintiff company, and registered in the name of the defendant, for the purpose of using it for the benefit of work, which the latter sold after the end of the working relationship between them for his own account.
In the details, a company filed a lawsuit against a former employee of it, demanding that he pay her an amount of 110,000 dirhams and the legal interest at 12% from the date of filing the lawsuit until full payment with fees and expenses, including attorney fees, noting that it was made during the work of the defendant with it. He bought a car and handed it over to him to use in connection with his work, after which he sold it for his own account.
While the report of the engineering expert specializing in cars delegated by the court showed that the relationship between the two parties to the litigation was a working relationship at the time of the end of this relationship in February 2020, and that the vehicle in question was owned by the defendant, and that it had been subjected to previous traffic accidents, and it has a transmission malfunction estimated at a value Its repair is five thousand dirhams, and the value of the car, which is the subject of the lawsuit, on the date of the completion of the defendant’s work with the plaintiff, is estimated at 80,000 dirhams.
The court stated that it was evident from the lawsuit papers that the plaintiff had paid the value of the car in question to the car dealership, in favor of the defendant by virtue of a bank check, if he worked for it, to use it for the benefit of the business, and registered it in his name, and the defendant did not provide evidence that he had paid the price of the car to the plaintiff or otherwise. that.
The court indicated that the defendant had terminated his services with the plaintiff, who stated that she had bought the car for the purpose of the defendant’s use of it if he worked with it for the benefit of the business, which would have the right to recover its value according to the market value at the time the defendant’s work ended with her, which the expert delegated in the lawsuit estimated at 80,000 dirhams Hence, the defendant is obliged to return the price of the car according to its market value at the time of the termination of the business relationship.
The court ruled to obligate the defendant to pay the plaintiff compensation in the amount of 80,000 dirhams, and interest is 4% from the date the judgment becomes conclusive, and to obligate the defendant to pay fees and expenses, and rejected other requests.