The Fujairah court convicted an Asian, 67, of providing false information to the investigation police, with the intent to mislead the judiciary, after he claimed that his vehicle number plate had been stolen by an unknown person, contrary to the truth, with the intention of covering up his fugitive friend from other charges.
In detail, the Public Prosecution referred two (Asian) defendants, the first of whom disrupted judicial procedures, and the other left his work for his sponsor in violation of the provisions of the Law on Entry and Residence of Foreigners, and he also worked for someone other than his sponsor, without complying with the conditions and conditions established for the transfer of sponsorship, and used a vehicle to transport passengers And he was driving it recklessly and recklessly in a way that posed a danger to the public, and when the security patrol asked him to stop, he ran away.
Public Prosecution investigations stated that the defendants, accompanied by a number of people, tried to push two women to get them into a vehicle under duress, and as soon as they saw the security patrol, they fled, and the driver of the vehicle was arrested and referred to the Public Prosecution.
By asking the first defendant about the evidence report and the investigations of the Public Prosecution, he denied the accusation against him, and decided that he sold the vehicle for 6000 dirhams and his license plate was stolen. When asked about the vehicle in the possession of the second defendant, he admitted that he lied in order to help him.
By questioning the second accused in the evidence report and the Public Prosecution, he denied the accusation against him, and decided that he had left the work of his sponsor a short time ago, and worked for his own account, indicating that he was not asking for a financial compensation in exchange for delivering people.
He pointed out that when he delivered his friends to the place they wanted, he was surprised that they returned to him after half an hour, asking him to move quickly and leave the place, explaining that he responded to their request without knowing the reasons, and drove his vehicle on the public road, and in the meantime a security patrol turned on the lights, She asked him to stop, but he did not respond to her request out of fear, and continued driving to his residence, removing the number plate, and then informing the first accused that he had been robbed, asking him to open a report at the nearest police station.
The court asked the second defendant, via video link, the accusation against him, and he denied the charge of not following the instructions of the traffic policeman, and working for someone other than the sponsor, and confessed to the accusation of leaving the sponsor.
The court affirmed that the accusation assigned to the accused is conclusively proven, for their conviction, due to the confession of the first accused in the prosecution’s investigations and the evidence report, in addition to the confession of the second accused in the trial session of the second charge, and his confession in the evidence report and the prosecution’s investigations.
The court ruled that the first accused be imprisoned for one month for the accusation against him, and the second accused was imprisoned for two months, with a fine of 1,000 dirhams, with deportation outside the country after the execution of the penalty, in addition to obligating them to pay the lawsuit fees.