After so much bad news, finally here’s a good one: the Taliban forgive their enemies and, therefore, they forgive us! And, they even reassure us: they will give them an example of how to govern, oppressing populations of defenseless co-religionists, women and children, above all. And, then, how the collaborators of the past regime and the many volunteers of the Italian, European and international humanitarian associations who have taken care, for 20 years, of real and educational poverty of the Afghans, through the generous sponsorships of Governments. and private.
They also reassure us with the contribution, of course, of their Pakistani allies, willing to host the parents of Samira, killed and made to disappear because she did not accept the “arranged marriage” that the family had prepared for her. And, again, with the obvious support of China moreover, a veteran of the pandemic massacre imposed on the world with millions of deaths and with irreparable damage to families and economies. Damages that, “au contraire”, will be compensated, but certainly not to the victims, but through a world colonization project that China hopes to implement, after having brought the economic resources of many civil and democratic countries around the world to their knees.
And, of course, from Russia, but with a keen eye on Turkey, Iran, Pakistan and, again, on “Hayat Tahrir al-Sham”, the Syrian branch of al-Qaeda which has already been located for years in 15 Afghan provinces; to the “Brotherhood” in Egypt, to the “Nahda” in Tunisia, to the “Isis” and even to “Hamas” in Gaza. Nations suspended between attention, interest, fear of being pervasively Islamized which, too, reassure us. To reassure drug and arms traffickers at the same time whose billionaire interests have always fueled terrorism. And, at this point, we must ask ourselves: “The terrorists who, for more than twenty years, with their attacks, have bloodied our countries, what do they forgive their enemies and how and of what do they reassure free Europe, above all? Because they are the same ones who, in Kabul, killed girls when they left school because, as girls, they don’t have to study.
It’s still, because not wearing the burka is an unacceptable crime for the millennial Sharia law. Sharia which, among other medieval impositions – no offense, means the Middle Ages! – foresees that girls at twelve can be married and made mothers. Pedophilia aside! And was it not perhaps the Prophet Mohammed who chose his wife and favorite Aisha at six, and then stiffened her at nine?
So, let us analyze what these squalid, bearded and barbaric subjects with an arrogant, pedantic and obtusely aggressive air should forgive us. Maybe just being civil, as undisputed heirs, albeit unconsciously, involuntarily, irresponsibly guilty, for not having validly carried them out, to the end, of epoch-making people’s revolutions: from the French revolution to the Bolshevik revolution, to the Maoist revolution that time, men and governments however, they have betrayed, altered, manipulated, transformed their values and emptied them of the deep, authentic, substantial and understandable meanings and motives that had inspired, motivated and made them act. China and Russia docent!
Or, perhaps, instead because, in recent years, we have been witnesses, happy and hopeful, of the “Arab springs”. Convinced that, at least, those new generations, who grew up in the shadow of even moderate Islam, would have protected them from being domesticated by dictatorial, pseudo-religious and ideologically fundamentalist regimes. How it happened, however. In the East and in the West, where, for example, the “Italianbani”, right and left, are convinced that, after all, the horror of terrorism is better than the Western one!
And finally, because we consider human and women’s rights to be fundamental and inalienable, conquered with difficulty, with infinite efforts, sacrifices and grief, to guarantee them full equality with that of men: in study, at work, before the law, in freedom of speech, of creative expression, of clothing. And to give them the full possibility of choosing a husband or a partner, without subjecting them – with fear and death threats – to contracting engagements and arranged marriages. So they can choose to have a child only if they want to.