The Abu Dhabi Court for Family and Civil and Administrative Claims ordered a woman to pay her husband 14,024 dollars, or its equivalent in dirhams, after she was convicted of seizing his bank card and embezzling the amount from it.
In the details, a man filed a lawsuit against his wife, in which he demanded to oblige her to pay him 14 thousand and 24 dollars or its equivalent in dirhams and 12% legal interest and oblige her to pay fees and expenses, noting that his wife, due to differences, took his bank card and seized 14 thousand and 24 dollars, and he was released from The incident was a criminal case and she was convicted of the charge and punished with three months’ imprisonment with a stay of execution, while the defendant’s lawyer submitted a reply memorandum, at the conclusion of which he sought to reject the case.
In the ruling, the court stated that according to the Civil Transactions Law, whoever usurped another person’s money must return it to him in the condition it was in at the time of the usurpation. Civil and commercial matters The judgment issued in criminal matters is considered authoritative in the civil lawsuit before the civil courts whenever it has made a necessary chapter in the occurrence of the act constituting the common basis between the criminal and civil lawsuits and in the legal description of this act and its attribution to its perpetrator.
The court indicated that the act for which the defendant was convicted was the seizure of the plaintiff’s card and the embezzlement of an amount of 14 thousand and 24 dollars, which is the same act on which the latter relied in filing his present case, and with that the penal judgment has settled the occurrence of the act constituting the common basis between the two criminal cases. And civil, which means that the defendant is occupied with the value of the amount of money that it seized, and the court ruled to obligate the defendant to pay the plaintiff 14 thousand and 24 dollars or its equivalent in dirhams, and the delayed interest at the rate of 5% from the date of filing the case, until the full payment, including no Exceeding the original amount awarded, in addition to obligating the defendant to pay the lawsuit fees and expenses.
The Abu Dhabi Court for Family and Civil and Administrative Claims ordered a woman to pay her husband 14,024 dollars, or its equivalent in dirhams, after she was convicted of seizing his bank card and embezzling the amount from it.
In the details, a man filed a lawsuit against his wife, in which he demanded to oblige her to pay him 14 thousand and 24 dollars or its equivalent in dirhams and 12% legal interest and oblige her to pay fees and expenses, noting that his wife, due to differences, took his bank card and seized 14 thousand and 24 dollars, and he was released from The incident was a criminal case and she was convicted of the charge and punished with three months’ imprisonment with a stay of execution, while the defendant’s lawyer submitted a reply memorandum, at the conclusion of which he sought to reject the case.
In the ruling, the court stated that according to the Civil Transactions Law, whoever usurped another person’s money must return it to him in the condition it was in at the time of the usurpation. Civil and commercial matters The judgment issued in criminal matters is considered authoritative in the civil lawsuit before the civil courts whenever it has made a necessary chapter in the occurrence of the act constituting the common basis between the criminal and civil lawsuits and in the legal description of this act and its attribution to its perpetrator.
The court indicated that the act for which the defendant was convicted was the seizure of the plaintiff’s card and the embezzlement of an amount of 14 thousand and 24 dollars, which is the same act on which the latter relied in filing his present case, and with that the penal judgment has settled the occurrence of the act constituting the common basis between the two criminal cases. And civil, which means that the defendant is occupied with the value of the amount of money that it seized, and the court ruled to obligate the defendant to pay the plaintiff 14 thousand and 24 dollars or its equivalent in dirhams, and the delayed interest at the rate of 5% from the date of filing the case, until the full payment, including no Exceeding the original amount awarded, in addition to obligating the defendant to pay the lawsuit fees and expenses.
The Abu Dhabi Court for Family and Civil and Administrative Claims ordered a woman to pay her husband 14,024 dollars, or its equivalent in dirhams, after she was convicted of seizing his bank card and embezzling the amount from it.
In the details, a man filed a lawsuit against his wife, in which he demanded to oblige her to pay him 14 thousand and 24 dollars or its equivalent in dirhams and 12% legal interest and oblige her to pay fees and expenses, noting that his wife, due to differences, took his bank card and seized 14 thousand and 24 dollars, and he was released from The incident was a criminal case and she was convicted of the charge and punished with three months’ imprisonment with a stay of execution, while the defendant’s lawyer submitted a reply memorandum, at the conclusion of which he sought to reject the case.
In the ruling, the court stated that according to the Civil Transactions Law, whoever usurped another person’s money must return it to him in the condition it was in at the time of the usurpation. Civil and commercial matters The judgment issued in criminal matters is considered authoritative in the civil lawsuit before the civil courts whenever it has made a necessary chapter in the occurrence of the act constituting the common basis between the criminal and civil lawsuits and in the legal description of this act and its attribution to its perpetrator.
The court indicated that the act for which the defendant was convicted was the seizure of the plaintiff’s card and the embezzlement of an amount of 14 thousand and 24 dollars, which is the same act on which the latter relied in filing his present case, and with that the penal judgment has settled the occurrence of the act constituting the common basis between the two criminal cases. And civil, which means that the defendant is occupied with the value of the amount of money that it seized, and the court ruled to obligate the defendant to pay the plaintiff 14 thousand and 24 dollars or its equivalent in dirhams, and the delayed interest at the rate of 5% from the date of filing the case, until the full payment, including no Exceeding the original amount awarded, in addition to obligating the defendant to pay the lawsuit fees and expenses.
The Abu Dhabi Court for Family and Civil and Administrative Claims ordered a woman to pay her husband 14,024 dollars, or its equivalent in dirhams, after she was convicted of seizing his bank card and embezzling the amount from it.
In the details, a man filed a lawsuit against his wife, in which he demanded to oblige her to pay him 14 thousand and 24 dollars or its equivalent in dirhams and 12% legal interest and oblige her to pay fees and expenses, noting that his wife, due to differences, took his bank card and seized 14 thousand and 24 dollars, and he was released from The incident was a criminal case and she was convicted of the charge and punished with three months’ imprisonment with a stay of execution, while the defendant’s lawyer submitted a reply memorandum, at the conclusion of which he sought to reject the case.
In the ruling, the court stated that according to the Civil Transactions Law, whoever usurped another person’s money must return it to him in the condition it was in at the time of the usurpation. Civil and commercial matters The judgment issued in criminal matters is considered authoritative in the civil lawsuit before the civil courts whenever it has made a necessary chapter in the occurrence of the act constituting the common basis between the criminal and civil lawsuits and in the legal description of this act and its attribution to its perpetrator.
The court indicated that the act for which the defendant was convicted was the seizure of the plaintiff’s card and the embezzlement of an amount of 14 thousand and 24 dollars, which is the same act on which the latter relied in filing his present case, and with that the penal judgment has settled the occurrence of the act constituting the common basis between the two criminal cases. And civil, which means that the defendant is occupied with the value of the amount of money that it seized, and the court ruled to obligate the defendant to pay the plaintiff 14 thousand and 24 dollars or its equivalent in dirhams, and the delayed interest at the rate of 5% from the date of filing the case, until the full payment, including no Exceeding the original amount awarded, in addition to obligating the defendant to pay the lawsuit fees and expenses.