The Dubai Criminal Court has sentenced a Gulf Arab man to ten years in prison for the premeditated killing of an Asian person in a dispute over the use of feed waste.
Investigations by the Public Prosecution revealed that the accused had intent to kill the victim, and even told a worker on his father’s farm about it, and then he carried out strange behavior during the execution of his crime, as he hit the dead man with a hammer on his head and chest while he was sleeping, then wrapped the body and put it in his vehicle and roamed in a desert area. He was in his car, looking for a place to throw it, and out of his fright, he threw it in one of the popular places, and while he was leaving, his car got stuck in the sand, so he left it and walked back after throwing the crime instrument, but a police patrol stopped him and told its members that he ran over the victim and did not kill him, and he was afraid of arrest He threw his body at the place where it was found.
A witness from the Dubai Police stated in the investigations of the Public Prosecution that a report was received about a person making a fuss “dropping” his car in an area near the Global Village. Entirely and her basin as well.
When asked about the source of the blood, he stated that he had caused a traffic accident for a person and had led to the location of the body that he had thrown at a site under construction, and a traffic charge was registered against him at first, but it was found through research and investigation that there was a problem between the accused and the victim, in the presence of a third person working on the farm of the father of the first .
By asking the aforementioned worker, he stated that the accused came to him and told him that he would kill the victim, and he asked for his help, but he refused.
The witness said that he and the victim were asleep on the day of the incident, so the killer woke him and asked him to accompany him quietly to the car and told him that he would kill his colleague now, and he had a hammer in his possession, so he did not imagine that he would do that, but he was terrified when he saw him hitting him on the head and chest, so he ran away for fear of to assault him in turn.
Confronting the accused later with this information, he confessed to the incident, deciding that he hit the victim, wrapped the body in a quilt, and threw it in a sandy area, and led to the location of the hammer he used in carrying out the crime.
By repeating his question in the Public Prosecution’s investigations, he denied hitting the victim on the chest, repeating that he ran over him with his car and did not kill him, and a psychological report issued by a medical committee proved that he was conscious and aware of what he was doing and had the will, insight and correct judgment on matters, while the forensic report proved that the injuries inflicted The victim as a result of being hit by a hard machine, and it is excluded as a result of a traffic accident.
In addition, during the trial, the defendant’s defense decided that he was under the influence of psychotropic substances and did not remember what happened, and submitted an inheritance notification from the victim’s family in which its members decided to waive their right to retribution.
In its ruling, the court confirmed its reassurance that the accused had the intention to kill, given the circumstances surrounding the incident. The crime and the accused treated him with a measure of clemency, and the penalty was reduced to ten years in prison.
The Dubai Criminal Court has sentenced a Gulf Arab man to ten years in prison for the premeditated killing of an Asian person in a dispute over the use of feed waste.
Investigations by the Public Prosecution revealed that the accused had intent to kill the victim, and even told a worker on his father’s farm about it, and then he carried out strange behavior during the execution of his crime, as he hit the dead man with a hammer on his head and chest while he was sleeping, then wrapped the body and put it in his vehicle and roamed in a desert area. He was in his car, looking for a place to throw it, and out of his fright, he threw it in one of the popular places, and while he was leaving, his car got stuck in the sand, so he left it and walked back after throwing the crime instrument, but a police patrol stopped him and told its members that he ran over the victim and did not kill him, and he was afraid of arrest He threw his body at the place where it was found.
A witness from the Dubai Police stated in the investigations of the Public Prosecution that a report was received about a person making a fuss “dropping” his car in an area near the Global Village. Entirely and her basin as well.
When asked about the source of the blood, he stated that he had caused a traffic accident for a person and had led to the location of the body that he had thrown at a site under construction, and a traffic charge was registered against him at first, but it was found through research and investigation that there was a problem between the accused and the victim, in the presence of a third person working on the farm of the father of the first .
By asking the aforementioned worker, he stated that the accused came to him and told him that he would kill the victim, and he asked for his help, but he refused.
The witness said that he and the victim were asleep on the day of the incident, so the killer woke him and asked him to accompany him quietly to the car and told him that he would kill his colleague now, and he had a hammer in his possession, so he did not imagine that he would do that, but he was terrified when he saw him hitting him on the head and chest, so he ran away for fear of to assault him in turn.
Confronting the accused later with this information, he confessed to the incident, deciding that he hit the victim, wrapped the body in a quilt, and threw it in a sandy area, and led to the location of the hammer he used in carrying out the crime.
By repeating his question in the Public Prosecution’s investigations, he denied hitting the victim on the chest, repeating that he ran over him with his car and did not kill him, and a psychological report issued by a medical committee proved that he was conscious and aware of what he was doing and had the will, insight and correct judgment on matters, while the forensic report proved that the injuries inflicted The victim as a result of being hit by a hard machine, and it is excluded as a result of a traffic accident.
In addition, during the trial, the defendant’s defense decided that he was under the influence of psychotropic substances and did not remember what happened, and submitted an inheritance notification from the victim’s family in which its members decided to waive their right to retribution.
In its ruling, the court confirmed its reassurance that the accused had the intention to kill, given the circumstances surrounding the incident. The crime and the accused treated him with a measure of clemency, and the penalty was reduced to ten years in prison.
The Dubai Criminal Court has sentenced a Gulf Arab man to ten years in prison for the premeditated killing of an Asian person in a dispute over the use of feed waste.
Investigations by the Public Prosecution revealed that the accused had intent to kill the victim, and even told a worker on his father’s farm about it, and then he carried out strange behavior during the execution of his crime, as he hit the dead man with a hammer on his head and chest while he was sleeping, then wrapped the body and put it in his vehicle and roamed in a desert area. He was in his car, looking for a place to throw it, and out of his fright, he threw it in one of the popular places, and while he was leaving, his car got stuck in the sand, so he left it and walked back after throwing the crime instrument, but a police patrol stopped him and told its members that he ran over the victim and did not kill him, and he was afraid of arrest He threw his body at the place where it was found.
A witness from the Dubai Police stated in the investigations of the Public Prosecution that a report was received about a person making a fuss “dropping” his car in an area near the Global Village. Entirely and her basin as well.
When asked about the source of the blood, he stated that he had caused a traffic accident for a person and had led to the location of the body that he had thrown at a site under construction, and a traffic charge was registered against him at first, but it was found through research and investigation that there was a problem between the accused and the victim, in the presence of a third person working on the farm of the father of the first .
By asking the aforementioned worker, he stated that the accused came to him and told him that he would kill the victim, and he asked for his help, but he refused.
The witness said that he and the victim were asleep on the day of the incident, so the killer woke him and asked him to accompany him quietly to the car and told him that he would kill his colleague now, and he had a hammer in his possession, so he did not imagine that he would do that, but he was terrified when he saw him hitting him on the head and chest, so he ran away for fear of to assault him in turn.
Confronting the accused later with this information, he confessed to the incident, deciding that he hit the victim, wrapped the body in a quilt, and threw it in a sandy area, and led to the location of the hammer he used in carrying out the crime.
By repeating his question in the Public Prosecution’s investigations, he denied hitting the victim on the chest, repeating that he ran over him with his car and did not kill him, and a psychological report issued by a medical committee proved that he was conscious and aware of what he was doing and had the will, insight and correct judgment on matters, while the forensic report proved that the injuries inflicted The victim as a result of being hit by a hard machine, and it is excluded as a result of a traffic accident.
In addition, during the trial, the defendant’s defense decided that he was under the influence of psychotropic substances and did not remember what happened, and submitted an inheritance notification from the victim’s family in which its members decided to waive their right to retribution.
In its ruling, the court confirmed its reassurance that the accused had the intention to kill, given the circumstances surrounding the incident. The crime and the accused treated him with a measure of clemency, and the penalty was reduced to ten years in prison.
The Dubai Criminal Court has sentenced a Gulf Arab man to ten years in prison for the premeditated killing of an Asian person in a dispute over the use of feed waste.
Investigations by the Public Prosecution revealed that the accused had intent to kill the victim, and even told a worker on his father’s farm about it, and then he carried out strange behavior during the execution of his crime, as he hit the dead man with a hammer on his head and chest while he was sleeping, then wrapped the body and put it in his vehicle and roamed in a desert area. He was in his car, looking for a place to throw it, and out of his fright, he threw it in one of the popular places, and while he was leaving, his car got stuck in the sand, so he left it and walked back after throwing the crime instrument, but a police patrol stopped him and told its members that he ran over the victim and did not kill him, and he was afraid of arrest He threw his body at the place where it was found.
A witness from the Dubai Police stated in the investigations of the Public Prosecution that a report was received about a person making a fuss “dropping” his car in an area near the Global Village. Entirely and her basin as well.
When asked about the source of the blood, he stated that he had caused a traffic accident for a person and had led to the location of the body that he had thrown at a site under construction, and a traffic charge was registered against him at first, but it was found through research and investigation that there was a problem between the accused and the victim, in the presence of a third person working on the farm of the father of the first .
By asking the aforementioned worker, he stated that the accused came to him and told him that he would kill the victim, and he asked for his help, but he refused.
The witness said that he and the victim were asleep on the day of the incident, so the killer woke him and asked him to accompany him quietly to the car and told him that he would kill his colleague now, and he had a hammer in his possession, so he did not imagine that he would do that, but he was terrified when he saw him hitting him on the head and chest, so he ran away for fear of to assault him in turn.
Confronting the accused later with this information, he confessed to the incident, deciding that he hit the victim, wrapped the body in a quilt, and threw it in a sandy area, and led to the location of the hammer he used in carrying out the crime.
By repeating his question in the Public Prosecution’s investigations, he denied hitting the victim on the chest, repeating that he ran over him with his car and did not kill him, and a psychological report issued by a medical committee proved that he was conscious and aware of what he was doing and had the will, insight and correct judgment on matters, while the forensic report proved that the injuries inflicted The victim as a result of being hit by a hard machine, and it is excluded as a result of a traffic accident.
In addition, during the trial, the defendant’s defense decided that he was under the influence of psychotropic substances and did not remember what happened, and submitted an inheritance notification from the victim’s family in which its members decided to waive their right to retribution.
In its ruling, the court confirmed its reassurance that the accused had the intention to kill, given the circumstances surrounding the incident. The crime and the accused treated him with a measure of clemency, and the penalty was reduced to ten years in prison.