A friendship between a European and a famous Arab broadcaster quickly developed into an emotional relationship, which over time turned into a sermon project, and ended in the police station and from there to the Public Prosecution, which charged the European with assaulting the broadcaster and threatening to divulge pictures and videos offensive to honor and modesty, while the announcer was charged with damaging Money intentionally transferred to others for breaking her boyfriend’s phone, and the prosecution referred them to the Criminal Court, which convicted them and imposed a fine of 10,000 dirhams on the first accused, and 5,000 dirhams against the broadcaster.
The announcer did not accept the verdict and appealed against it before the Court of Appeal, which concluded her innocence of the charge against her.
The details of the incident date back to last August, when a report was received of a mutual assault in an apartment in a building located in the middle of the Palm Island in Dubai. Her workplace is in the satellite station for broadcasting the newsletter.
After the end of her work, she attended and submitted a medical examination form issued by Rashid Hospital stating that she had injuries, and reported that she had known the accused nine months ago and the relationship between them developed from friendship to an emotional relationship until he proposed to her, explaining that on the day of the incident and while they were discussing the future of their relationship together, an event happened. A dispute between them developed into his insulting and slapping her in the face, which led to her hitting the dining table, which resulted in her injury.
She added that he threatened her, after she filed a complaint against him, to publish photos of them together on the beach that offend her, and he will inform the management of the channel in which she works and his colleagues with his photos and videos.
The forensic medicine proved that she had suffered a traumatic injury that could occur as a result of hitting the legs of the table, and that required treatment for less than 20 days without causing permanent disability.
For his part, the accused said in the investigations of the Public Prosecution that he had a relationship with the announcer, and while they were together in his residence, a dispute arose while they were discussing the future of their relationship, so she insulted him as a result of her suspicion of betraying her, and threw his phone on the ground, which damaged it, and broke a table and was in a state of hysterics, She tried to attack him, and he pushed her, causing her to fall on the sofa, and then she left for her work to read the news bulletin.
For his part, the legal representative of the broadcaster (the second accused), lawyer Muhammad Al-Najjar, stated in the appeal memorandum before the Court of Appeal that the ruling of the Court of First Instance was marred by a mistake in the application of the law, as it considered all the actions of the first accused, which included insult, assault and threat to be linked to one criminal project, although the accusation The latter is not related to the first crime, which is considered a waste of his client’s right, especially since the threat came after the first crime and after she reported it to the police, a crime punishable by seven years imprisonment according to the Federal Penal Code.
He also pleaded maliciously the accusation leveled against his client, based on the defendant’s confession that he pushed her, so he fell on the table and smashed it, in addition to that she was the one who informed the police, and the accused threatened her to publish her photos if she went ahead with her complaint, and as soon as the accusation was brought against him, he began to fabricate this story, including cracking his phone.
For its part, the Court of Appeal accepted the appeal and acquitted the second accused, based on its convictions of the maliciousness of the accusation, especially since the accused did not hand over his phone for examination, but rather brought a repair bill that did not prove anything, which led the court to doubt the truthfulness of his statements.
A friendship between a European and a famous Arab broadcaster quickly developed into an emotional relationship, which over time turned into a sermon project, and ended in the police station and from there to the Public Prosecution, which charged the European with assaulting the broadcaster and threatening to divulge pictures and videos offensive to honor and modesty, while the announcer was charged with damaging Money intentionally transferred to others for breaking her boyfriend’s phone, and the prosecution referred them to the Criminal Court, which convicted them and imposed a fine of 10,000 dirhams on the first accused, and 5,000 dirhams against the broadcaster.
The announcer did not accept the verdict and appealed against it before the Court of Appeal, which concluded her innocence of the charge against her.
The details of the incident date back to last August, when a report was received of a mutual assault in an apartment in a building located in the middle of the Palm Island in Dubai. Her workplace is in the satellite station for broadcasting the newsletter.
After the end of her work, she attended and submitted a medical examination form issued by Rashid Hospital stating that she had injuries, and reported that she had known the accused nine months ago and the relationship between them developed from friendship to an emotional relationship until he proposed to her, explaining that on the day of the incident and while they were discussing the future of their relationship together, an event happened. A dispute between them developed into his insulting and slapping her in the face, which led to her hitting the dining table, which resulted in her injury.
She added that he threatened her, after she filed a complaint against him, to publish photos of them together on the beach that offend her, and he will inform the management of the channel in which she works and his colleagues with his photos and videos.
The forensic medicine proved that she had suffered a traumatic injury that could occur as a result of hitting the legs of the table, and that required treatment for less than 20 days without causing permanent disability.
For his part, the accused said in the investigations of the Public Prosecution that he had a relationship with the announcer, and while they were together in his residence, a dispute arose while they were discussing the future of their relationship, so she insulted him as a result of her suspicion of betraying her, and threw his phone on the ground, which damaged it, and broke a table and was in a state of hysterics, She tried to attack him, and he pushed her, causing her to fall on the sofa, and then she left for her work to read the news bulletin.
For his part, the legal representative of the broadcaster (the second accused), lawyer Muhammad Al-Najjar, stated in the appeal memorandum before the Court of Appeal that the ruling of the Court of First Instance was marred by a mistake in the application of the law, as it considered all the actions of the first accused, which included insult, assault and threat to be linked to one criminal project, although the accusation The latter is not related to the first crime, which is considered a waste of his client’s right, especially since the threat came after the first crime and after she reported it to the police, a crime punishable by seven years imprisonment according to the Federal Penal Code.
He also pleaded maliciously the accusation leveled against his client, based on the defendant’s confession that he pushed her, so he fell on the table and smashed it, in addition to that she was the one who informed the police, and the accused threatened her to publish her photos if she went ahead with her complaint, and as soon as the accusation was brought against him, he began to fabricate this story, including cracking his phone.
For its part, the Court of Appeal accepted the appeal and acquitted the second accused, based on its convictions of the maliciousness of the accusation, especially since the accused did not hand over his phone for examination, but rather brought a repair bill that did not prove anything, which led the court to doubt the truthfulness of his statements.
A friendship between a European and a famous Arab broadcaster quickly developed into an emotional relationship, which over time turned into a sermon project, and ended in the police station and from there to the Public Prosecution, which charged the European with assaulting the broadcaster and threatening to divulge pictures and videos offensive to honor and modesty, while the announcer was charged with damaging Money intentionally transferred to others for breaking her boyfriend’s phone, and the prosecution referred them to the Criminal Court, which convicted them and imposed a fine of 10,000 dirhams on the first accused, and 5,000 dirhams against the broadcaster.
The announcer did not accept the verdict and appealed against it before the Court of Appeal, which concluded her innocence of the charge against her.
The details of the incident date back to last August, when a report was received of a mutual assault in an apartment in a building located in the middle of the Palm Island in Dubai. Her workplace is in the satellite station for broadcasting the newsletter.
After the end of her work, she attended and submitted a medical examination form issued by Rashid Hospital stating that she had injuries, and reported that she had known the accused nine months ago and the relationship between them developed from friendship to an emotional relationship until he proposed to her, explaining that on the day of the incident and while they were discussing the future of their relationship together, an event happened. A dispute between them developed into his insulting and slapping her in the face, which led to her hitting the dining table, which resulted in her injury.
She added that he threatened her, after she filed a complaint against him, to publish photos of them together on the beach that offend her, and he will inform the management of the channel in which she works and his colleagues with his photos and videos.
The forensic medicine proved that she had suffered a traumatic injury that could occur as a result of hitting the legs of the table, and that required treatment for less than 20 days without causing permanent disability.
For his part, the accused said in the investigations of the Public Prosecution that he had a relationship with the announcer, and while they were together in his residence, a dispute arose while they were discussing the future of their relationship, so she insulted him as a result of her suspicion of betraying her, and threw his phone on the ground, which damaged it, and broke a table and was in a state of hysterics, She tried to attack him, and he pushed her, causing her to fall on the sofa, and then she left for her work to read the news bulletin.
For his part, the legal representative of the broadcaster (the second accused), lawyer Muhammad Al-Najjar, stated in the appeal memorandum before the Court of Appeal that the ruling of the Court of First Instance was marred by a mistake in the application of the law, as it considered all the actions of the first accused, which included insult, assault and threat to be linked to one criminal project, although the accusation The latter is not related to the first crime, which is considered a waste of his client’s right, especially since the threat came after the first crime and after she reported it to the police, a crime punishable by seven years imprisonment according to the Federal Penal Code.
He also pleaded maliciously the accusation leveled against his client, based on the defendant’s confession that he pushed her, so he fell on the table and smashed it, in addition to that she was the one who informed the police, and the accused threatened her to publish her photos if she went ahead with her complaint, and as soon as the accusation was brought against him, he began to fabricate this story, including cracking his phone.
For its part, the Court of Appeal accepted the appeal and acquitted the second accused, based on its convictions of the maliciousness of the accusation, especially since the accused did not hand over his phone for examination, but rather brought a repair bill that did not prove anything, which led the court to doubt the truthfulness of his statements.
A friendship between a European and a famous Arab broadcaster quickly developed into an emotional relationship, which over time turned into a sermon project, and ended in the police station and from there to the Public Prosecution, which charged the European with assaulting the broadcaster and threatening to divulge pictures and videos offensive to honor and modesty, while the announcer was charged with damaging Money intentionally transferred to others for breaking her boyfriend’s phone, and the prosecution referred them to the Criminal Court, which convicted them and imposed a fine of 10,000 dirhams on the first accused, and 5,000 dirhams against the broadcaster.
The announcer did not accept the verdict and appealed against it before the Court of Appeal, which concluded her innocence of the charge against her.
The details of the incident date back to last August, when a report was received of a mutual assault in an apartment in a building located in the middle of the Palm Island in Dubai. Her workplace is in the satellite station for broadcasting the newsletter.
After the end of her work, she attended and submitted a medical examination form issued by Rashid Hospital stating that she had injuries, and reported that she had known the accused nine months ago and the relationship between them developed from friendship to an emotional relationship until he proposed to her, explaining that on the day of the incident and while they were discussing the future of their relationship together, an event happened. A dispute between them developed into his insulting and slapping her in the face, which led to her hitting the dining table, which resulted in her injury.
She added that he threatened her, after she filed a complaint against him, to publish photos of them together on the beach that offend her, and he will inform the management of the channel in which she works and his colleagues with his photos and videos.
The forensic medicine proved that she had suffered a traumatic injury that could occur as a result of hitting the legs of the table, and that required treatment for less than 20 days without causing permanent disability.
For his part, the accused said in the investigations of the Public Prosecution that he had a relationship with the announcer, and while they were together in his residence, a dispute arose while they were discussing the future of their relationship, so she insulted him as a result of her suspicion of betraying her, and threw his phone on the ground, which damaged it, and broke a table and was in a state of hysterics, She tried to attack him, and he pushed her, causing her to fall on the sofa, and then she left for her work to read the news bulletin.
For his part, the legal representative of the broadcaster (the second accused), lawyer Muhammad Al-Najjar, stated in the appeal memorandum before the Court of Appeal that the ruling of the Court of First Instance was marred by a mistake in the application of the law, as it considered all the actions of the first accused, which included insult, assault and threat to be linked to one criminal project, although the accusation The latter is not related to the first crime, which is considered a waste of his client’s right, especially since the threat came after the first crime and after she reported it to the police, a crime punishable by seven years imprisonment according to the Federal Penal Code.
He also pleaded maliciously the accusation leveled against his client, based on the defendant’s confession that he pushed her, so he fell on the table and smashed it, in addition to that she was the one who informed the police, and the accused threatened her to publish her photos if she went ahead with her complaint, and as soon as the accusation was brought against him, he began to fabricate this story, including cracking his phone.
For its part, the Court of Appeal accepted the appeal and acquitted the second accused, based on its convictions of the maliciousness of the accusation, especially since the accused did not hand over his phone for examination, but rather brought a repair bill that did not prove anything, which led the court to doubt the truthfulness of his statements.