A (Gulf Arab) driver drove his vehicle on a street without lights in the Shaam area, north of Ras Al Khaimah, and ran over three (Gulf women) girls, Fatima (13 years), and her sister Ibtisam (20 years), who is five months pregnant, and their relative Shamsa (13 years), which caused In the death of the girl Shamsa and Ibtisam lost her fetus, the plaintiffs, Shamsa’s parents, filed a lawsuit before a partial civil court to demand compensation of 200,000 for the moral and material damage they incurred as a result of the death of their daughter. .
In detail, the plaintiffs stated that the driver who caused the accident, and his vehicle was insured by the second defendant, the Public Prosecution charged him with two charges of not adhering to traffic signs and its rules and caused the accident. On the verdict of the Public Prosecution after the death of the victim Shamsa, the inheritance of the plaintiffs, and the lack of justice for the fetus of the victim, Ibtisam, as the court amended the description of the accusation for the accused to cause the death of the victim, Shamsa, and the Court of Appeal ruled to oblige the person who caused the accident and the insured company to pay the blood’s guardians Shamiya is 200 thousand dirhams legal blood money, and to pay the parents of the blood of the fetus of the victim, Ibtisam 20 thousand dirhams legal blood money.
The insurance company’s agent, lawyer Hanan Al-Bayed, stated that the case was not accepted for filing a case other than the path established by law, and continued that the circumstances of the accident confirm the lack of any responsibility for the driver for the alleged damages that the victims sustained without evidence, as the evidence from the police report and the sketch plan that the place of the accident is a road It has two opposite lanes that are not separated and has no lighting and is designated for the passage of vehicles, and that the plaintiffs’ heirs walked in the middle of the road in black (abaya), which is the road to cars, which makes them directly responsible for what happened to them.
She explained that her client was determined that if the deceased Shamsa had adhered to the axioms of traffic and traffic regulations and the rules of attention, caution and preservation of life, the accident would not have occurred and the death would not have occurred. The case is untrue and unsubstantiated and not based on a valid legal basis.
The attorney for the plaintiffs, Lawyer Khaled Al-Asqalani, affirmed that the basis of the lawsuit is tort liability and the right of the injured to be compensated for what he has suffered, and that the insurance company’s agent’s payment is not sound, given that the cause of the accident was convicted under a penal judgment, so he is requested to rule in favor of the lawsuit.
In the judgment of a partial civil court, it was stated that the court did not prove to the court that the victim Shamsa participated in the error in the traffic accident, and therefore the court cannot re-discuss the extent of her contribution to the error that led to her death, explaining that the child Shamsa died at the age of 13 and that the material damage caused The plaintiffs claim is not proven that they were deprived of a material benefit.
She explained that the moral damage inflicted on the plaintiffs because she died at the age of flowers and was filling the house with joy for her parents and that her death would generate a feeling of sadness for them due to her loss in difficult circumstances, and accordingly the court obliges the defendants who caused the accident and the insured company to pay the plaintiffs 120 thousand A dirham in compensation for the moral damage they sustained as a result of the death of their inheritance, in addition to the legal interest 6%, and the lawsuit was dismissed for what exceeded that, and it obligated the two defendants to pay the lawsuit expenses and attorney fees.
A (Gulf Arab) driver drove his vehicle on a street without lights in the Shaam area, north of Ras Al Khaimah, and ran over three (Gulf women) girls, Fatima (13 years), and her sister Ibtisam (20 years), who is five months pregnant, and their relative Shamsa (13 years), which caused In the death of the girl Shamsa and Ibtisam lost her fetus, the plaintiffs, Shamsa’s parents, filed a lawsuit before a partial civil court to demand compensation of 200,000 for the moral and material damage they incurred as a result of the death of their daughter. .
In detail, the plaintiffs stated that the driver who caused the accident, and his vehicle was insured by the second defendant, the Public Prosecution charged him with two charges of not adhering to traffic signs and its rules and caused the accident. On the verdict of the Public Prosecution after the death of the victim Shamsa, the inheritance of the plaintiffs, and the lack of justice for the fetus of the victim, Ibtisam, as the court amended the description of the accusation for the accused to cause the death of the victim, Shamsa, and the Court of Appeal ruled to oblige the person who caused the accident and the insured company to pay the blood’s guardians Shamiya is 200 thousand dirhams legal blood money, and to pay the parents of the blood of the fetus of the victim, Ibtisam 20 thousand dirhams legal blood money.
The insurance company’s agent, lawyer Hanan Al-Bayed, stated that the case was not accepted for filing a case other than the path established by law, and continued that the circumstances of the accident confirm the lack of any responsibility for the driver for the alleged damages that the victims sustained without evidence, as the evidence from the police report and the sketch plan that the place of the accident is a road It has two opposite lanes that are not separated and has no lighting and is designated for the passage of vehicles, and that the plaintiffs’ heirs walked in the middle of the road in black (abaya), which is the road to cars, which makes them directly responsible for what happened to them.
She explained that her client was determined that if the deceased Shamsa had adhered to the axioms of traffic and traffic regulations and the rules of attention, caution and preservation of life, the accident would not have occurred and the death would not have occurred. The case is untrue and unsubstantiated and not based on a valid legal basis.
The attorney for the plaintiffs, Lawyer Khaled Al-Asqalani, affirmed that the basis of the lawsuit is tort liability and the right of the injured to be compensated for what he has suffered, and that the insurance company’s agent’s payment is not sound, given that the cause of the accident was convicted under a penal judgment, so he is requested to rule in favor of the lawsuit.
In the judgment of a partial civil court, it was stated that the court did not prove to the court that the victim Shamsa participated in the error in the traffic accident, and therefore the court cannot re-discuss the extent of her contribution to the error that led to her death, explaining that the child Shamsa died at the age of 13 and that the material damage caused The plaintiffs claim is not proven that they were deprived of a material benefit.
She explained that the moral damage inflicted on the plaintiffs because she died at the age of flowers and was filling the house with joy for her parents and that her death would generate a feeling of sadness for them due to her loss in difficult circumstances, and accordingly the court obliges the defendants who caused the accident and the insured company to pay the plaintiffs 120 thousand A dirham in compensation for the moral damage they sustained as a result of the death of their inheritance, in addition to the legal interest 6%, and the lawsuit was dismissed for what exceeded that, and it obligated the two defendants to pay the lawsuit expenses and attorney fees.
A (Gulf Arab) driver drove his vehicle on a street without lights in the Shaam area, north of Ras Al Khaimah, and ran over three (Gulf women) girls, Fatima (13 years), and her sister Ibtisam (20 years), who is five months pregnant, and their relative Shamsa (13 years), which caused In the death of the girl Shamsa and Ibtisam lost her fetus, the plaintiffs, Shamsa’s parents, filed a lawsuit before a partial civil court to demand compensation of 200,000 for the moral and material damage they incurred as a result of the death of their daughter. .
In detail, the plaintiffs stated that the driver who caused the accident, and his vehicle was insured by the second defendant, the Public Prosecution charged him with two charges of not adhering to traffic signs and its rules and caused the accident. On the verdict of the Public Prosecution after the death of the victim Shamsa, the inheritance of the plaintiffs, and the lack of justice for the fetus of the victim, Ibtisam, as the court amended the description of the accusation for the accused to cause the death of the victim, Shamsa, and the Court of Appeal ruled to oblige the person who caused the accident and the insured company to pay the blood’s guardians Shamiya is 200 thousand dirhams legal blood money, and to pay the parents of the blood of the fetus of the victim, Ibtisam 20 thousand dirhams legal blood money.
The insurance company’s agent, lawyer Hanan Al-Bayed, stated that the case was not accepted for filing a case other than the path established by law, and continued that the circumstances of the accident confirm the lack of any responsibility for the driver for the alleged damages that the victims sustained without evidence, as the evidence from the police report and the sketch plan that the place of the accident is a road It has two opposite lanes that are not separated and has no lighting and is designated for the passage of vehicles, and that the plaintiffs’ heirs walked in the middle of the road in black (abaya), which is the road to cars, which makes them directly responsible for what happened to them.
She explained that her client was determined that if the deceased Shamsa had adhered to the axioms of traffic and traffic regulations and the rules of attention, caution and preservation of life, the accident would not have occurred and the death would not have occurred. The case is untrue and unsubstantiated and not based on a valid legal basis.
The attorney for the plaintiffs, Lawyer Khaled Al-Asqalani, affirmed that the basis of the lawsuit is tort liability and the right of the injured to be compensated for what he has suffered, and that the insurance company’s agent’s payment is not sound, given that the cause of the accident was convicted under a penal judgment, so he is requested to rule in favor of the lawsuit.
In the judgment of a partial civil court, it was stated that the court did not prove to the court that the victim Shamsa participated in the error in the traffic accident, and therefore the court cannot re-discuss the extent of her contribution to the error that led to her death, explaining that the child Shamsa died at the age of 13 and that the material damage caused The plaintiffs claim is not proven that they were deprived of a material benefit.
She explained that the moral damage inflicted on the plaintiffs because she died at the age of flowers and was filling the house with joy for her parents and that her death would generate a feeling of sadness for them due to her loss in difficult circumstances, and accordingly the court obliges the defendants who caused the accident and the insured company to pay the plaintiffs 120 thousand A dirham in compensation for the moral damage they sustained as a result of the death of their inheritance, in addition to the legal interest 6%, and the lawsuit was dismissed for what exceeded that, and it obligated the two defendants to pay the lawsuit expenses and attorney fees.
A (Gulf Arab) driver drove his vehicle on a street without lights in the Shaam area, north of Ras Al Khaimah, and ran over three (Gulf women) girls, Fatima (13 years), and her sister Ibtisam (20 years), who is five months pregnant, and their relative Shamsa (13 years), which caused In the death of the girl Shamsa and Ibtisam lost her fetus, the plaintiffs, Shamsa’s parents, filed a lawsuit before a partial civil court to demand compensation of 200,000 for the moral and material damage they incurred as a result of the death of their daughter. .
In detail, the plaintiffs stated that the driver who caused the accident, and his vehicle was insured by the second defendant, the Public Prosecution charged him with two charges of not adhering to traffic signs and its rules and caused the accident. On the verdict of the Public Prosecution after the death of the victim Shamsa, the inheritance of the plaintiffs, and the lack of justice for the fetus of the victim, Ibtisam, as the court amended the description of the accusation for the accused to cause the death of the victim, Shamsa, and the Court of Appeal ruled to oblige the person who caused the accident and the insured company to pay the blood’s guardians Shamiya is 200 thousand dirhams legal blood money, and to pay the parents of the blood of the fetus of the victim, Ibtisam 20 thousand dirhams legal blood money.
The insurance company’s agent, lawyer Hanan Al-Bayed, stated that the case was not accepted for filing a case other than the path established by law, and continued that the circumstances of the accident confirm the lack of any responsibility for the driver for the alleged damages that the victims sustained without evidence, as the evidence from the police report and the sketch plan that the place of the accident is a road It has two opposite lanes that are not separated and has no lighting and is designated for the passage of vehicles, and that the plaintiffs’ heirs walked in the middle of the road in black (abaya), which is the road to cars, which makes them directly responsible for what happened to them.
She explained that her client was determined that if the deceased Shamsa had adhered to the axioms of traffic and traffic regulations and the rules of attention, caution and preservation of life, the accident would not have occurred and the death would not have occurred. The case is untrue and unsubstantiated and not based on a valid legal basis.
The attorney for the plaintiffs, Lawyer Khaled Al-Asqalani, affirmed that the basis of the lawsuit is tort liability and the right of the injured to be compensated for what he has suffered, and that the insurance company’s agent’s payment is not sound, given that the cause of the accident was convicted under a penal judgment, so he is requested to rule in favor of the lawsuit.
In the judgment of a partial civil court, it was stated that the court did not prove to the court that the victim Shamsa participated in the error in the traffic accident, and therefore the court cannot re-discuss the extent of her contribution to the error that led to her death, explaining that the child Shamsa died at the age of 13 and that the material damage caused The plaintiffs claim is not proven that they were deprived of a material benefit.
She explained that the moral damage inflicted on the plaintiffs because she died at the age of flowers and was filling the house with joy for her parents and that her death would generate a feeling of sadness for them due to her loss in difficult circumstances, and accordingly the court obliges the defendants who caused the accident and the insured company to pay the plaintiffs 120 thousand A dirham in compensation for the moral damage they sustained as a result of the death of their inheritance, in addition to the legal interest 6%, and the lawsuit was dismissed for what exceeded that, and it obligated the two defendants to pay the lawsuit expenses and attorney fees.