with a bad interpretation, ignorance or on purpose, Jesus Ricardo Salazar Leyva, presenter of the Institutional Revolutionary Party, never thought that the shot was going to backfire when he raised the issue with the Electoral Institute of the State of Sinaloa to remove him from the doubt of whether a nomination for procurator trustee can go in the same election for a councilor by the principle of proportional representation. As the IEES declared it valid only for mayor and councilor, taking into account article 22 of the Law of Electoral Institutions and Procedures of the State of Sinaloa, Salazar Leyva challenged the decision and argued that said article was unconstitutional. It is assumed that he wanted the exception not only for the mayor and councilor, but also for the trustees and councilors. And the Regional Chamber of the Judicial Power of the Federation agreed with him in that the Electoral Court of the State of Sinaloa did not study the unconstitutionality, so it ordered a new sentence.
And like the TESIN resolved that there should not be double candidatures, that is, the candidate for mayor cannot go as a councilor through proportional representation, some began to question the determination of why it allows candidates for councilors to go through the path of relative majority and through proportional representation . To begin with, due to the actions of Salazar Leyva, the PRI already has to scissor where it has a candidate for mayor and at the same time it has him as a plural councilor. The candidate has to choose a position. But he pilloris others from his own party who are candidates for councilor through relative majority and proportional representation. The Electoral Tribunal and the IEES are saving these in their resolutions, but what the Regional Chamber of the TPJF says is missing.
And there is who observe that the Constitution prohibits the registration of the same person as a candidate for different popularly elected positions in the same electoral process. They mention the recent case of the Citizen Movement candidate for the Senate, Fernanda Rivera, which canceled the registration of that same position, but through proportional representation. So, they say, applying constitutionality, the Electoral Tribunal and the IEES should take the same approach with mayors, attorney generals and councilors who go both ways. Or not?
The case does not benefit to no specific party because the determination is equal for everyone, although Morena and the PRI are the least. The other parties, the so-called small parties, the mayoral candidates, are the “damaged ones.” But some observe that the magistrates and electoral advisors do not want to make more waves in the parties that they “tolerate” bringing attorney trustees (origin of the case) and councilors in both ways even though it contradicts the Constitution. And here if Morena and the PRI have theirs and not to mention the other political institutes. What a mess the PRI representative, Jesús Ricardo Salazar, got them into. Of course, this debate was pending.
#mess #double #candidates
