In an unprecedented event in the history of the jelectoral justice of our State, the Electoral Tribunal of the State of Sinaloa (TEESIN)today commanded by Carolina Chávez and Aída Inzunza, strategic bishops of the Morenism corrupting democratic institutionsthey issued an imitation of resolution that restrict absolutely the nomination of candidates simultaneouslythat is, both by relative majority and by proportional representation.
This is not a new rule within our electoral system, it was provided for in the repealed State Electoral Law of 1992, and was practically reproduced in the current Law of Electoral Institutions and Procedures of 2015. Everything originated based on the fact that from the PRI we promoted a consultation to Sinaloa Electoral Institute to determine whether the simultaneous nomination of candidates for the procuratorate and proportional representation councils was viable.
It should be noted that article 22 of the LIPEES It prohibits anyone from being nominated for two different positions in the same process. However, the legal prohibition is not absolute, since it expressly establishes as exceptions, candidates for municipal presidencies and councillors, so that in both cases it is valid for them to be nominated by both means.
We question the constitutionality and conventionality of the restrictive interpretation of that provision, since on the one hand it allows two candidates who vote on the ballot to be nominated on the PR lists, but it does not allow it for the candidates for the procuracy receiverships, which which represents unequal, unjustified, unreasonable and disproportionate treatment, since they are also voted on the same ballot.
Previously, the TEESIN had declared the PRI's appeals unfounded, however, a Constitutional Review Trial was promoted, which was resolved by the Guadalajara Regional Chamber of the Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Branch of the Federation on April 10, which agreed with us. , granted TEESIN 72 hours to issue a new resolution through which it would carry out an ex officio control of the constitutionality of article 22 of the LIPEES and article 8 of the Candidacy Registration Guidelines. Although the first project presented was in accordance with the PRI's reasoning, it was rejected by three magistrates, with Carolina Chávez being awarded the preparation of the counter project (engrose).
In an unusual ignorance of this mechanism, he chose to go beyond his limits, and not only prevent the simultaneity of the candidacies for Procurator Trustees, but also the cases permitted by the law itself! This would practically force a massive replacement of candidates already registered and approved.
The aberrant thing about the ignorance on the part of the TEESIN presidency, in the middle of the campaign, and on a mere whim, lies in believing that by running for both principles, there is a risk of access to both positions. Our God of our lives! ! The Electoral Tribunal of the Judicial Branch of the Federation will now have to review this episode, meanwhile we ask ourselves: In whose hands is our electoral justice?
More from the same author:
see more
#TEESIN39s #aberrant #electoral #rights