Three insulting phrases on WhatsApp cost a Gulf young man 5000 dirhams, which he sent to a Gulf girl, and led him to a partial civil court in Ras Al Khaimah, obligating him to pay the plaintiff the amount as compensation for the moral damage he sustained.
In detail, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit in which she stated that the defendant had sent messages to her via “WhatsApp”, which included insulting and insulting phrases, including “Cowardly, and by exposing you, and you are not good”, she submitted a report to the police, and it was referred to the Public Prosecution, and from there to the court. The criminal court fined him 3000 dirhams, and acquitted him of the first charge. The accused appealed the ruling in the appeal, which decided to amend the fine to one thousand dirhams. The case papers indicated that the plaintiff instituted a civil lawsuit to demand that the defendant pay her 15,000 dirhams in compensation for material and moral damage, with a legal interest of 9% from the date of the judgment becoming.
The plaintiff’s attorney, Lawyer Muhammad Mohi, submitted a memorandum in which he maintained the authority of the penal verdict, given that he had decided to convict the defendant, which is a final verdict.
The defendant’s attorney, Omar Al-Zaabi, submitted a memorandum holding that the penal judgment supported the case, and did not discuss the common basis between the criminal and civil lawsuits, but rather referred the civil lawsuit to the competent civil court because it needed an investigation so as not to disrupt the criminal lawsuit’s decision.
He pointed out that the plaintiff’s leaving her work and receiving her dues was of her own will and that his client had nothing to do with that.
In its ruling, a partial civil court confirmed that the cassation ruling had not been appealed, as the ruling had become final.
She explained that the defendant had been proven wrong in insulting the plaintiff, adding that the court considers that the damage caused to the plaintiff is proven by sending the defendant via (WhatsApp) phrases that included “Cowardly, and expose you, and you are not good,” and the defendant’s confession to the Public Prosecution’s investigations by sending a text message Thus, she stated that the phrases included insulting and insulting words for the plaintiff. The court orders the defendant to pay the plaintiff 5,000 dirhams in compensation for the moral damage she has suffered, with legal interest of 6% from the date of the judgment rendering until payment is completed, and to reject the lawsuit in excess of that, and oblige him to pay the lawsuit expenses and attorney fees.
Three insulting phrases on WhatsApp cost a Gulf young man 5000 dirhams, which he sent to a Gulf girl, and led him to a partial civil court in Ras Al Khaimah, obligating him to pay the plaintiff the amount as compensation for the moral damage he sustained.
In detail, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit in which she stated that the defendant had sent messages to her via “WhatsApp”, which included insulting and insulting phrases, including “Cowardly, and by exposing you, and you are not good”, she submitted a report to the police, and it was referred to the Public Prosecution, and from there to the court. The criminal court fined him 3000 dirhams, and acquitted him of the first charge. The accused appealed the ruling in the appeal, which decided to amend the fine to one thousand dirhams. The case papers indicated that the plaintiff instituted a civil lawsuit to demand that the defendant pay her 15,000 dirhams in compensation for material and moral damage, with a legal interest of 9% from the date of the judgment becoming.
The plaintiff’s attorney, Lawyer Muhammad Mohi, submitted a memorandum in which he maintained the authority of the penal verdict, given that he had decided to convict the defendant, which is a final verdict.
The defendant’s attorney, Omar Al-Zaabi, submitted a memorandum holding that the penal judgment supported the case, and did not discuss the common basis between the criminal and civil lawsuits, but rather referred the civil lawsuit to the competent civil court because it needed an investigation so as not to disrupt the criminal lawsuit’s decision.
He pointed out that the plaintiff’s leaving her work and receiving her dues was of her own will and that his client had nothing to do with that.
In its ruling, a partial civil court confirmed that the cassation ruling had not been appealed, as the ruling had become final.
She explained that the defendant had been proven wrong in insulting the plaintiff, adding that the court considers that the damage caused to the plaintiff is proven by sending the defendant via (WhatsApp) phrases that included “Cowardly, and expose you, and you are not good,” and the defendant’s confession to the Public Prosecution’s investigations by sending a text message Thus, she stated that the phrases included insulting and insulting words for the plaintiff. The court orders the defendant to pay the plaintiff 5,000 dirhams in compensation for the moral damage she has suffered, with legal interest of 6% from the date of the judgment rendering until payment is completed, and to reject the lawsuit in excess of that, and oblige him to pay the lawsuit expenses and attorney fees.
Three insulting phrases on WhatsApp cost a Gulf young man 5000 dirhams, which he sent to a Gulf girl, and led him to a partial civil court in Ras Al Khaimah, obligating him to pay the plaintiff the amount as compensation for the moral damage he sustained.
In detail, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit in which she stated that the defendant had sent messages to her via “WhatsApp”, which included insulting and insulting phrases, including “Cowardly, and by exposing you, and you are not good”, she submitted a report to the police, and it was referred to the Public Prosecution, and from there to the court. The criminal court fined him 3000 dirhams, and acquitted him of the first charge. The accused appealed the ruling in the appeal, which decided to amend the fine to one thousand dirhams. The case papers indicated that the plaintiff instituted a civil lawsuit to demand that the defendant pay her 15,000 dirhams in compensation for material and moral damage, with a legal interest of 9% from the date of the judgment becoming.
The plaintiff’s attorney, Lawyer Muhammad Mohi, submitted a memorandum in which he maintained the authority of the penal verdict, given that he had decided to convict the defendant, which is a final verdict.
The defendant’s attorney, Omar Al-Zaabi, submitted a memorandum holding that the penal judgment supported the case, and did not discuss the common basis between the criminal and civil lawsuits, but rather referred the civil lawsuit to the competent civil court because it needed an investigation so as not to disrupt the criminal lawsuit’s decision.
He pointed out that the plaintiff’s leaving her work and receiving her dues was of her own will and that his client had nothing to do with that.
In its ruling, a partial civil court confirmed that the cassation ruling had not been appealed, as the ruling had become final.
She explained that the defendant had been proven wrong in insulting the plaintiff, adding that the court considers that the damage caused to the plaintiff is proven by sending the defendant via (WhatsApp) phrases that included “Cowardly, and expose you, and you are not good,” and the defendant’s confession to the Public Prosecution’s investigations by sending a text message Thus, she stated that the phrases included insulting and insulting words for the plaintiff. The court orders the defendant to pay the plaintiff 5,000 dirhams in compensation for the moral damage she has suffered, with legal interest of 6% from the date of the judgment rendering until payment is completed, and to reject the lawsuit in excess of that, and oblige him to pay the lawsuit expenses and attorney fees.
Three insulting phrases on WhatsApp cost a Gulf young man 5000 dirhams, which he sent to a Gulf girl, and led him to a partial civil court in Ras Al Khaimah, obligating him to pay the plaintiff the amount as compensation for the moral damage he sustained.
In detail, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit in which she stated that the defendant had sent messages to her via “WhatsApp”, which included insulting and insulting phrases, including “Cowardly, and by exposing you, and you are not good”, she submitted a report to the police, and it was referred to the Public Prosecution, and from there to the court. The criminal court fined him 3000 dirhams, and acquitted him of the first charge. The accused appealed the ruling in the appeal, which decided to amend the fine to one thousand dirhams. The case papers indicated that the plaintiff instituted a civil lawsuit to demand that the defendant pay her 15,000 dirhams in compensation for material and moral damage, with a legal interest of 9% from the date of the judgment becoming.
The plaintiff’s attorney, Lawyer Muhammad Mohi, submitted a memorandum in which he maintained the authority of the penal verdict, given that he had decided to convict the defendant, which is a final verdict.
The defendant’s attorney, Omar Al-Zaabi, submitted a memorandum holding that the penal judgment supported the case, and did not discuss the common basis between the criminal and civil lawsuits, but rather referred the civil lawsuit to the competent civil court because it needed an investigation so as not to disrupt the criminal lawsuit’s decision.
He pointed out that the plaintiff’s leaving her work and receiving her dues was of her own will and that his client had nothing to do with that.
In its ruling, a partial civil court confirmed that the cassation ruling had not been appealed, as the ruling had become final.
She explained that the defendant had been proven wrong in insulting the plaintiff, adding that the court considers that the damage caused to the plaintiff is proven by sending the defendant via (WhatsApp) phrases that included “Cowardly, and expose you, and you are not good,” and the defendant’s confession to the Public Prosecution’s investigations by sending a text message Thus, she stated that the phrases included insulting and insulting words for the plaintiff. The court orders the defendant to pay the plaintiff 5,000 dirhams in compensation for the moral damage she has suffered, with legal interest of 6% from the date of the judgment rendering until payment is completed, and to reject the lawsuit in excess of that, and oblige him to pay the lawsuit expenses and attorney fees.