The Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance ruled, obligating an insurance company to pay an amount of 252,428 dirhams to one of the companies, in compensation for the damages caused to it and caused by the occurrence of a crane inside its headquarters insured by the convict.
In the details, a company filed a lawsuit, in which it demanded that a contracting company and an insurance company be obligated, jointly and severally, to pay it an amount of 757,365 dirhams, in compensation for the material damages incurred by it, while obligating it to pay legal interest at 12% from the time of the claim until payment, and in fees and expenses and in return for Lawyer’s fees, noting that the crane owned by the first defendant caused an accident inside the plaintiff’s headquarters, which resulted in damages and losses, as it collided with concrete panels and iron barriers, pointing out that the crane in question was insured by the second defendant.
During the consideration of the case, the plaintiff’s attorney attended, as represented the representative of the first defendant and submitted an answering memorandum, at the conclusion of which he requested that the suit be rejected for lack of merit and lack of evidence, and the agent of the second defendant also attended and submitted a reply memorandum and requested in the conclusion that the suit not be accepted, while the expert’s report showed before The court stated that the damages caused by the accident included 20 concrete walls, in addition to 10 iron barriers, and the total value of the damages was estimated at 252,428 dirhams.
While the court clarified in the rationale for its ruling that what is proven from the lawsuit papers and documents and from the expert report, that the vehicle “the crane” is the tool of the accident, is owned by the first defendant and insured by the second defendant, indicating that it is reassured by the expert report, and from it it can be concluded that the second defendant’s responsibility to compensate the plaintiff company As it can be concluded from the course of the case, that the relationship between the two parties to the case is governed by the insurance document, the case document, which holds the second defendant responsible for compensating the plaintiff.
The Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance ruled, obligating an insurance company to pay an amount of 252,428 dirhams to one of the companies, in compensation for the damages caused to it and caused by the occurrence of a crane inside its headquarters insured by the convict.
In the details, a company filed a lawsuit, in which it demanded that a contracting company and an insurance company be obligated, jointly and severally, to pay it an amount of 757,365 dirhams, in compensation for the material damages incurred by it, while obligating it to pay legal interest at 12% from the time of the claim until payment, and in fees and expenses and in return for Lawyer’s fees, noting that the crane owned by the first defendant caused an accident inside the plaintiff’s headquarters, which resulted in damages and losses, as it collided with concrete panels and iron barriers, pointing out that the crane in question was insured by the second defendant.
During the consideration of the case, the plaintiff’s attorney attended, as represented the representative of the first defendant and submitted an answering memorandum, at the conclusion of which he requested that the suit be rejected for lack of merit and lack of evidence, and the agent of the second defendant also attended and submitted a reply memorandum and requested in the conclusion that the suit not be accepted, while the expert’s report showed before The court stated that the damages caused by the accident included 20 concrete walls, in addition to 10 iron barriers, and the total value of the damages was estimated at 252,428 dirhams.
While the court clarified in the rationale for its ruling that what is proven from the lawsuit papers and documents and from the expert report, that the vehicle “the crane” is the tool of the accident, is owned by the first defendant and insured by the second defendant, indicating that it is reassured by the expert report, and from it it can be concluded that the second defendant’s responsibility to compensate the plaintiff company As it can be concluded from the course of the case, that the relationship between the two parties to the case is governed by the insurance document, the case document, which holds the second defendant responsible for compensating the plaintiff.
The Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance ruled, obligating an insurance company to pay an amount of 252,428 dirhams to one of the companies, in compensation for the damages caused to it and caused by the occurrence of a crane inside its headquarters insured by the convict.
In the details, a company filed a lawsuit, in which it demanded that a contracting company and an insurance company be obligated, jointly and severally, to pay it an amount of 757,365 dirhams, in compensation for the material damages incurred by it, while obligating it to pay legal interest at 12% from the time of the claim until payment, and in fees and expenses and in return for Lawyer’s fees, noting that the crane owned by the first defendant caused an accident inside the plaintiff’s headquarters, which resulted in damages and losses, as it collided with concrete panels and iron barriers, pointing out that the crane in question was insured by the second defendant.
During the consideration of the case, the plaintiff’s attorney attended, as represented the representative of the first defendant and submitted an answering memorandum, at the conclusion of which he requested that the suit be rejected for lack of merit and lack of evidence, and the agent of the second defendant also attended and submitted a reply memorandum and requested in the conclusion that the suit not be accepted, while the expert’s report showed before The court stated that the damages caused by the accident included 20 concrete walls, in addition to 10 iron barriers, and the total value of the damages was estimated at 252,428 dirhams.
While the court clarified in the rationale for its ruling that what is proven from the lawsuit papers and documents and from the expert report, that the vehicle “the crane” is the tool of the accident, is owned by the first defendant and insured by the second defendant, indicating that it is reassured by the expert report, and from it it can be concluded that the second defendant’s responsibility to compensate the plaintiff company As it can be concluded from the course of the case, that the relationship between the two parties to the case is governed by the insurance document, the case document, which holds the second defendant responsible for compensating the plaintiff.
The Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance ruled, obligating an insurance company to pay an amount of 252,428 dirhams to one of the companies, in compensation for the damages caused to it and caused by the occurrence of a crane inside its headquarters insured by the convict.
In the details, a company filed a lawsuit, in which it demanded that a contracting company and an insurance company be obligated, jointly and severally, to pay it an amount of 757,365 dirhams, in compensation for the material damages incurred by it, while obligating it to pay legal interest at 12% from the time of the claim until payment, and in fees and expenses and in return for Lawyer’s fees, noting that the crane owned by the first defendant caused an accident inside the plaintiff’s headquarters, which resulted in damages and losses, as it collided with concrete panels and iron barriers, pointing out that the crane in question was insured by the second defendant.
During the consideration of the case, the plaintiff’s attorney attended, as represented the representative of the first defendant and submitted an answering memorandum, at the conclusion of which he requested that the suit be rejected for lack of merit and lack of evidence, and the agent of the second defendant also attended and submitted a reply memorandum and requested in the conclusion that the suit not be accepted, while the expert’s report showed before The court stated that the damages caused by the accident included 20 concrete walls, in addition to 10 iron barriers, and the total value of the damages was estimated at 252,428 dirhams.
While the court clarified in the rationale for its ruling that what is proven from the lawsuit papers and documents and from the expert report, that the vehicle “the crane” is the tool of the accident, is owned by the first defendant and insured by the second defendant, indicating that it is reassured by the expert report, and from it it can be concluded that the second defendant’s responsibility to compensate the plaintiff company As it can be concluded from the course of the case, that the relationship between the two parties to the case is governed by the insurance document, the case document, which holds the second defendant responsible for compensating the plaintiff.